Look Out 2016

I was out with some friends yesterday to close out the holidays. The issue of education and “fixing schools” in poor urban areas came up. I explained how school “success” is measured by the use of “achievement data,” and that the results of these test scores have a high correlation to socio-economic status. Thus poor schools are set up for failure because of their poverty, and all of public education is blamed and this blame is then used as justification for disinvesting in public education, while increasing the opportunity for profit through privatization.

It was a short conversation. Some questions. No arguments. It was simple. My highly privileged friends got it immediately.

Why is it so hard for others?

Today I woke up and read a piece in the Detroit Free Press called, “2016: Stories to Watch.”  There were two separate paragraphs written by Rochelle Riley, a well known opinion editor for the Free Press, which is positioned as the “liberal” news source in opposition to the “conservative” Detroit News. (I put quotes around those words because I’m truly not sure what they mean anymore, other than to serve as abstractions that we can organize meaningless differences around.)

In the first paragraph, Riley writes about, “A tale of two Detroits.” This has become a common concern in Detroit as it attempts to recovery economically. The concern is that those of privilege are the beneficiaries of the Detroit’s gentrification, while the marginalized continue to struggle. Riley describes the “two Detroits”: “Detroit is a city of two tales…one of sunshine and joy and renaissance. The other a landscape of shadows, and hurt and longing.” Riley rightly ends with her concern of, “whether Detroit’s comeback is an equal opportunity employer.”

All well and good so far.

But next, Riley writes about schools in Detroit without making any connection between the context that these schools exist within, and their position in serving those most marginalized in her previous paragraph on the “two Detroits.”

This absolutely boggles my mind.

Riley writes on Detroit’s renaissance, “Success can come only with a viable working education system for Detroit kids that trains them to be responsible, tax-paying adults.”

I’m not sure how to even address this sentence, as it leaves so many questions.

First, it sees those in poverty through the deficit lens, assuming that those suffering from poverty must be in this condition because of their lack of “responsibility,” which leaves them unable to pay taxes. This is clearly something that these people need to be “trained” out of.

Paul Thomas succinctly explains how the language of deficit  functions this way:

“… the message persists that impoverished parents lack something that is thus passed on to their children, who must have that lack filled.

In other words, we are not willing to turn our deficit gaze away from the victims of poverty and toward the systemic conditions creating that poverty… (Emphasis added)

Abondoned Detroit Classroom

In one simple sentence, Riley, intentionally or not, shifts the gaze of her readers, and thus accountability, from the systemic conditions that created poverty, to the victims of that poverty.

Linked to this is the idea of “what works.” Again, “what works” in schools is measured by achievement data. And the students in these schools are set up for failure. The game is absolutely, unequivocally rigged against them.

As I’ve written previously,

“…when we are unavoidably involved in anything to do with achievement data’ we must act with the recognition that such data is not a reflection of ability.  Nor is it a reflection of achievement.  It is simply a marker of privilege. ‘Achievement data’ tells us what we already know from history – our society is full of inequalities, and race and poverty are the organizing principles of these inequalities. This data, taken as real, has become the lever for the current education reform movement that is decimating our public education system.”

 Riley has fallen into the trap of assuming that achievement data is a meaningful measure of “what works.” She fails to recognize that, rather than measuring “achievement,” this data simply shows us where privilege lies. In this case, it tells us what we already know- that the students in Detroit are ravaged by a history of racism and poverty.


And this makes a following sentence in Riley’s article downright chilling. “…I plan to take a continuing look at programs that work. Every program should work. If it doesn’t it should be shut down– something I called for concerning DPS in my first column in October 2000.” (Emphasis added)


So much for an investment of resources where those resources are most needed. So much for recognizing the increased need for support that conditions of poverty create. So much for addressing the structural conditions that lead to poverty in the first place.

DPS refers to Detroit Public Schools. Shut down.

A visible, clear statement for the privatization of our public school systems.

People used to be ashamed of making these kinds of statements, especially in a “liberal” newspaper.

Look out 2016.

Photo (http://detroitarchitectjournal.blogspot.com/2012/02/story-of-timbuktu_06.html)


2 responses to “Look Out 2016

  1. If we use Riley’s reasoning that we should shut down what doesn’t work, they we must shut down poverty and corporations like Walmart and most fast food chains that do not pay a living wage to many of their employees. These corporations will respond that jobs would be lost if the paid a living wage but there are examples out there that this isn’t true. For instance, In-N-Out Burger, a fast food chain owned and controlled by one family, pays a living wage with great health benefits and even helps their workers with the costs of college. Costco and Trader Joes, up to now, have paid a living wage with good retirement and health benefits and these fair companies that treat their employees better have better retention rates.

    As for the way many people think about the term “liberals” or “conservatives” or the public schools, these are people who have trouble seeing anything but black and white. I have an old friend like that I’ve known for almost sixty years.

    Ever since President Reagan murdered the Fairness Doctrine that was there to support truth and balance in the media, conservative talk radio and much of the corporate controlled media that is also conservative has bashed the term “liberals” until it has become something deranged and evil to distrust for many people who have simple and damaged thinking.

    These people—like my old friend I can hardly stand anymore—are crippled when it comes to seeing the complexity of the rainbow of colors between the black and white. That’s why they accept the simple demonized stereotypes that have been created for “liberals”. Conservatives have not been as demonized in the media as bad as liberals have, but the tea party element of the far right is close and right behind them are the evangelical fundamentalist Christians who want to bring on Armageddon, the KKK and white supremacists.

  2. You are wise in pointing out the educational game being played — not only in Detroit, but across the nation. The classroom picture you have attached, for example, should speak for itself. However, depending upon who is perceiving its message, you always get two separate responses (responses attached to the larger goal of the observer). (1) Society is responsible for forcing a second-hand status upon some of its citizens; (2) These people just don’t care about themselves or their environment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s